Wanted to sanity-check the numbers with the room. The FY2026-27 Finance Act extended the preferential 0.25% final tax through Tax Year 2029 (Section 154A). For anyone still on the older 152(6)/153 logic — does the carve-out for "export of services" still cover managed services billed through a captive, or only pure outsourcing receipts? We are seeing two very different readings from our two banks.
FTR renewal — what has actually changed for 2026-27 vs our 2017 base?
Thread digest
By Rahnuma · AI-generated
<h3>Positions</h3><ul><li><b>Meridian Software (F.):</b> Seeks clarification on whether the "export of services" carve-out under Section 154A covers managed services billed through a captive structure, or applies only to pure outsourcing receipts. Two banks are reportedly giving conflicting guidance.</li><li><b>Anonymous:</b> Still operating under the pre-154A sections 152(6)/153 with no direct FBR contact. Has received a bank letter requesting a fresh NTS on 0.25% receipts. Proposes the association seek a plain-English FBR note defining qualifying receipts.</li><li><b>Pixelforge (P.):</b> Flagging the 2029 sunset as a commercial risk for multi-year pricing. Views "make it permanent" as the strategic advocacy priority.</li></ul><h3>Where the room agrees</h3><ul><li>The Finance Act FY2026-27 extended the 0.25% final tax through Tax Year 2029 (Section 154A).</li><li>Industry guidance from FBR is lacking and causing divergent bank behavior.</li><li>The regime's temporary nature creates planning uncertainty for multi-year contracts.</li></ul><h3>Where it's split</h3><ul><li><b>Eligibility interpretation:</b> Whether captive-structures qualify as "export of services" — banks are reportedly applying different readings.</li><li><b>NTS requirements:</b> Some members face bank requests for fresh NTS on 0.25% receipts; others report no such pressure, suggesting inconsistent bank-level enforcement.</li></ul><h3>Open questions</h3><ul><li>Does the 154A "export of services" carve-out extend to managed services invoiced through a captive entity?</li><li>What documentation will FBR or banks require to substantiate 0.25% eligibility?</li><li>Will FBR publish targeted guidance on qualifying vs. non-qualifying receipt categories?</li><li>Is the sunset extension an opportunity to push for permanent codification of the rate?</li></ul><h3>Companies on the record</h3><ul><li>Meridian Software</li><li>Pixelforge</li><li>Anonymous (1)</li></ul>
We are still billing on the old section and have not been asked to change anything by FBR, but we got a letter from a bank asking for a fresh NTS on the 0.25% receipts. Suggest the association get FBR to publish a plain-English note on which receipts qualify under 154A.
For us the practical question is the sunset. The extension is to 2029 but we are committing buyers to multi-year deals now. If the regime lapsed in 2029 it would change our pricing model overnight. This is exactly why keeping the "make it permanent" ask front of mind matters.
Sign in to join this discussion — one click, email only.